Comments on: “Real issue in video is gay sex”

By: Gelai

Gelai — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 09:52:35 +0000

i respect his opinion as a clergy man. he lives in his own morals and virtues.

however, to categorically state that the main issue on that video lies solely on the “wrong act of a guy with another man” is ridiculous, not to mention outrageous and certainly illogical…

church seems to have a paradox on certain issues such as this, if same had happened to a woman (did sex with a man and placed a canister on her behind), would they react the same? maybe…maybe not.

rev. dakay, the point is professional ethics and human rights…not morality!
if you were on the video, wouldn’t you feel the same?

on the other side, he is also correct that what happened before the video is wrong…but we (gays) must admit its wrong and committed a sin…rather than to give justification that what we did is right even if its not!
==========================================

Gelo, you wrote: “Homosexual acts are intrinsically evil and contrary to natural law.”
…it is. so as pre-marital sex, abortion, masturbation and even just a mere thought of sexual acts whether with a man or with a woman. THESE ARE ALL EVIL!.but as i’ve said we must confessed that we’re sinned. and we (including gays and lesbians) can enter heaven as long as we are pure and clean. what is “pure and clean”? that is yet to be known. the second coming is yet to come, so let’s not talk biblically anymore because these arguments will end up to nothing!

Will you wrote: “There are more than 1000 documented species of animals that engage in homosexual activity.”
..true! but we are not animal. we are humans, the highest class of creature. we think way beyond the animals do. our feelings are not like them. so if you would justifically compare homo acts with the animals, then you’re nothing but an animal!

i’m gay, i live happily as gay and i’m also human, a natural sinner but im sure i will enter HIS Kingdom.

By: JC

JC — Sun, 25 May 2008 05:14:45 +0000

Dapat sa Fake na Pari na yan..BIBLE and Ipasok sa kanyang Anus o sa mukha..sandali, magkamukha ang anus at mukha niya. Nalilito na ako…

By: Fab

Fab — Sun, 25 May 2008 03:36:30 +0000

Xempre ang mga bakla ipagtatanggol ang kapwa bakla. Imoral talaga ang mga bakla, pero hindi naman lahat. Kasuklam suklam sa paningin ng Diyos ang ginagawa ng mga bakla!

By: kyokushin

kyokushin — Fri, 23 May 2008 06:52:20 +0000

im gay and also an active member of the church. ano ba talaga ang basehan ng moralidad? sino ba dapat ang nagdidikta ng tama sa mali? clearly, the issue is not homosexuality. the way i see it.. its an issue about people who does not know anything about respect.. tingin ko dapat matuto munang rumespeto and church leader naten..

By: Dak

Dak — Sun, 04 May 2008 16:02:35 +0000

i have a clinical instructor who worked at uae and handled few operations like that of what happened in Cebu..di naman pinagpyestahan dun dito lng satin ang ganun daw..kaya walang kaunlaran dito sa tin kasi ang kultura nang tao dito ay mapamghusga..no one is born perfect! lahat tayo makasalanan..kaya wag sila magmalinis!

By: Jack

Jack — Wed, 30 Apr 2008 21:19:47 +0000

YOU ARE CORRECT, MR. PINOY GAY. GUSTO LANG NANG PUBLICITY NI MSGR. LAGAY ….AY…DAKAY PALA…ANG PANGIT NG APELYIDO….HE HE HE HE

By: Pinoy Gay

Pinoy Gay — Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:51:32 +0000

Both sides may kasalanan? I agree.
Don’t take the incident at face value.

But it doesn’t mean na pag may kasalanan ka dapat kang ipahiya,pagtawanan at husgahan. Even criminals have dignity.

“let him who is without sin cast the first stone.”

Hindi ung kasalanan ng pasyente at partner niya sa pagpasak ng bote sa puwet ang issue dito. Hindi crime ang ginawa nila.

Hindi din ito pagkunsinte sa katangahan nila ng partner niya. Kundi ang privacy ng pasiyente at pagtunton sa sinumpaang etiquette ng medical practitioners.

Iyun ang issues dito. Tama ba mga ate at Msgr Dakay?

By: Leonard Robles

Leonard Robles — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 23:12:36 +0000

ang mga bakla, tomboy at bisexuals ay TAO at ANAK NG DIYOS. i do not belive that only “homosexuals cannot enter heaven” as the bible says. i believe that this is eithr a mistranslation from the original hebrew (or was it aramiac? i dont rememebr) text or simply a conspiracy because the bible we now know indicates “homosexuals” yet no reference on “female homosexuals/lesbvians”. the transl;ation was absolutely unfair, unclear and up front self-righteous. again, i am NOT mocking the word of God. i am standing up against the mistranslation, misinterpretation and misconception about our kind. we are NOT minions of satan who are out to “eat human male flesh”. being gay is NOT about “in between the legs/crotch”. NO! it’s all about the heart and mind. kung ang dios marunong magpatawad at mang-unawa, tao pa kaya? God will undestand us. He did not set us up or what. He made us this way for a reason. what it is some may never know. but 1 thing’s sure: gay men are real people. gay men are NOT demons. gay men are CHILDREN OF GOD and can indeed enter heaven because of faith they have in God. remember the Word also says “for it is by grace through faith one is saved” so this totally negates “homos cant enter hgeaven” since gay men have faith in God. the bible is NOt ironic. again, it’s the stupid mistranslation that f***d up the whole concept.

By: Leonard Robles

Leonard Robles — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:58:38 +0000

that gay man’s privacy was indeed violated. stupid doctors and nurses. dumbasses unprofessional!!! leave the guy alone! man f**k those nagmamagandang doctor akala mo kung sinong dios-diosan! yeah right!

By: Jak

Jak — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:22:22 +0000

The real issue here my friends eh yung privacy ng tao, bakla man sya o hindi. Ang problema dito sa MSGR DAKAY na ito eh nakikisawsaw sa issue. Manalamin ka muna bago ka mag-judge nang tao, baka mas bayot ka pa dun sa tao. Lalaki, babae, tomboy, bading man yung involved wala na kayong paki MSGR. DAKDAK, dapat ng ipagtanggol mo yung tao at hindi pintasan ang kabadingan. ANG DAMING PARING BAKLA NOH.